eprintid: 8682
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 11
dir: disk0/00/00/86/82
datestamp: 2024-07-29 04:13:40
lastmod: 2024-07-29 04:13:40
status_changed: 2024-07-29 04:13:40
type: monograph
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: repository@staff.ukdw.ac.id
creators_name: , Paulus Widiatmoko
creators_name: , Ignatius Tri Endarto
creators_id: 0518117701
creators_id: 0521039101
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/RTM
contributors_name: , Diana Omega Santi
title: ICT FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION: AN INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND PRAXIS IN YOGYAKARTA
ispublished: unpub
subjects: L1
subjects: PE
full_text_status: restricted
monograph_type: project_report
date: 2020-12-02
publisher: Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
place_of_pub: Yogyakarta
pages: 100
institution: Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
department: Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
referencetext: Berk, R.A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU
in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and
Learning, 5 (1), 1-21
Borg,S. (1997).Unifying concepts in the study of teachers’ cognitive structures. Unpublished
manuscript.
Braak, J. (2001). Individual Characteristics Influencing Teachers’ Class Use of
Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141–
157. https://doi.org/10.2190/81YV-CGMU-5HPM-04EG
Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods
research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., &Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer
technology a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 928-
1003.
Fortanet-Gómez, I. &Camiciottoli, B. C. 2015. Multimodal analysis in academic settings:
From research to teaching. New York: Routledge.
Khan et al. (2012). “Barriers to the Introduction of ICT into Education in Developing
Countries: The Example of Bangladesh,” International Journal of Insertion, vol. 5, no.
2, ISSN: 1694-609X.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary
communication.
Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Krashen, Stephen D. (1988).Second Language Acquisition and Second Language
Learning.Prentice-Hall International
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2007). The multimodal page: A systemic functional exploration. In
Royce, T. D. &Bowcher, W. L. (Eds.). New directions in the analysis of multimodal
discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1–14.
Ma, W. W. K., Andersson, R., &Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of
computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 21, 387–395.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, S & Sharma, R. (2005). Interactive multimedia and education training. London: Idea
Group Inc.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A
framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Morgan, T. (1996). Using technology to enhance learning: Changing the chunks. Learn Lead
Technology 23(5), 49-51.
Mumtaz. Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A
review of the literature, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol.9, No.3, 319-342,
2000.
Ndubisi, N. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the
theory of planned behaviour and the technology acceptance model. International
Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571-591.
O’Halloran, K. 2004. Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Oxford &Shearin (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical
framework. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 512-514.
Pelgrum, W.J. (2001). Obstacles to the Integration of ICT in Education: Results
from a Worldwide Educational Assessment. Computers & Education 37, 163-
178.
Prensky, M. (2001), "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1", On the Horizon, Vol. 9 No.
5, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Reddi, U.V. (2003). Multimedia as an educational tool. In U.V. Reddi, & S. Mishra (Eds.),
Educational multimedia: A handbook for teacher-developers. New Delhi: CEMCA
Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., &Schüz, B. (2005). Action planning and coping
planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of
Social Psychology, 35(4), 565-576. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.258
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15,4–14.
Yilmaz, O. and Bayraktar D.M. (2013) Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational
technologies and their individual innovativeness categories. Procedia-social and
behavioral sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 3458 – 3461
funders: widiatmoko@staff.ukdw.ac.id
citation:   Paulus Widiatmoko and Ignatius Tri Endarto  (2020) ICT FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION: AN INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND PRAXIS IN YOGYAKARTA.  Research Report (Lecturer). Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta.    (Unpublished)  
document_url: https://katalog.ukdw.ac.id/8682/1/103_PENDAHULUAN_KESIMPULAN_DAFTARPUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://katalog.ukdw.ac.id/8682/2/103_FULLTEXT.pdf